Portfolio-wide visibility, down to a single element.
You answer to investors and to a board. Bildstak turns the models, costs, and documents across your portfolio into dashboards you can stand behind, and handovers you can score.
A portfolio is only as legible as its worst-documented project.
Every project reports differently
One team uses one CDE, another uses its own. Comparing projects across the portfolio means normalising the data by hand.
Handover quality is a guess
The model and the asset data arrive at handover. Whether they are complete and usable is something you find out later, in operations.
Reporting up takes a project
Board and investor updates pull from a dozen sources. Assembling one is itself a small project every quarter.
What Bildstak gives you
Portfolio dashboards
Every project rolls into one view: cost, schedule, coordination, and document health, side by side and comparable.
Reports and dashboards →Handover quality scoring
Score the model and asset data against your handover standard, so a project's completeness is a number you can see, not a surprise later.
BIM, BCF, IDS, COBie →Investor-grade reporting
ESG and embodied-carbon figures draw from the same federated data as the rest of the dashboard, so the report you send up is the report you trust.
Federation engine →Handovers you can score, portfolios you can compare.
Each project in the portfolio reports into the same structure, so a slow project sits visible next to a healthy one. At handover, the model and COBie data are scored against your standard, and a low score is something you act on before the project closes, not after the building is in operation. ESG and embodied-carbon reporting come from the same data, so the investor update and the operations record agree.
See reports and dashboards →What changes for your organisation
Projects compare cleanly
Every project reports into one structure, so a problem project stands out early.
Handovers arrive usable
Quality is scored before close-out, so operations inherits an asset record they can rely on.
Board updates assemble themselves
The portfolio dashboard is the source, so quarterly reporting is a review rather than a rebuild.
Frequently asked questions
How does Bildstak help owners and developers?
Bildstak gives owners and developers a single live view across every project in their portfolio — cost variance, schedule performance, open RFIs and risk rank — without depending on contractor-produced reports. Ask a question in plain English and get a cited answer from the federated data. Read the full answer →
How do I rank my projects by risk?
Bildstak's Analyst autonomously investigates every connected data source across the portfolio — schedule slippage, cost variance, open RFIs, claim exposure, coordination issues — and ranks projects by risk with evidence, so directors can prioritise attention without waiting for project teams to self-report. Read the full answer →
What is "the Analyst" in Bildstak?
The Analyst is Bildstak's autonomous risk investigation module. It cross-references every connected source — BIM, schedule, cost, RFIs, documents — ranks risks across the portfolio with evidence, and surfaces findings proactively, without needing to be asked a specific question. Read the full answer →
Is my project data secure with Bildstak?
Bildstak's security model is architectural: your project data can stay entirely on your side. It runs in your own VPC, on-premise, or fully air-gapped. Bildstak does not train AI on your data, and query and action audit logs are available for every project. Read the full answer →
How much does Bildstak cost and how is it priced?
Bildstak is priced per project, with two tiers plus optional add-on modules, so cost is predictable for procurement. Pricing scales with the project rather than per-seat, and a tailored quote is available on request. Read the full answer →
See your portfolio in one dashboard.
Book a demo and bring your hardest cross-source question.